01/15/2024 / By Laura Harris
The legal case against a former Kentucky county clerk who refused to sign the marriage licenses of same-sex couples in 2015 due to her religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman may overturn a Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.
In 2015, Kim Davis, a devout Christian, cited religious grounds as justification for her refusal to sign the marriage license of David Ermold and David Moore, despite a prior Supreme Court ruling – Obergefell v. Hodges – declaring that same-sex marriage is a constitutional right. This led to the current case against her, Ermold v. Davis. (Related: Matt Walsh challenges Joe Rogan on same-sex ‘marriage’ and surrogacy: ‘Mom is not expendable.’)
In September 2023, after years of legal proceedings, a jury in the District Court of Eastern Kentucky awarded $50,000 in damages to each plaintiff. In addition, Judge David Bunning granted the couple an extra $260,000 to cover attorney’s fees and other expenses.
According to Mat Staver, the founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, a conservative Christian legal foundation representing Davis, this case has the potential to challenge Obergefell v. Hodges. Liberty Counsel argues that the damages awarded were based on insufficient evidence, violating the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
“Then they switched over to they had hurt feelings and they did not present any evidence of that. You can’t get damages based on hurt feelings without showing some evidence, corroborating evidence, medical evidence and psychological evidence. They presented nothing,” Staver said.
As a response, the Liberty Counsel is set to formally request that Bunning reverse the jury’s verdict. Should this motion be denied, the legal foundation plans to escalate the matter to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals and, if necessary, onward to the Supreme Court.
Liberty Counsel contends that prior 6th Circuit decisions emphasize the need for documented evidence of harm rather than mere testimony regarding emotional distress. The foundation aims to present a case not just against the damages awarded but to argue for the broader issue of religious liberty.
“This case has the potential to extend the same religious freedom protections beyond Kentucky and to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, which was wrongly decided and should be overturned,” Staver said.
In December 2022, President Joe Biden made it more difficult to overturn same-sex marriage when he signed the Respect for Marriage Act (RFMA), which extends federal protections to same-sex marriages.
The RFMA mandates that states honor the validity of out-of-state marriage licenses, including those for same-sex and interracial unions, and repeals the Defense of Marriage Act, which previously defined marriage as between a man and a woman.
The legislation received bipartisan support in Congress, with 39 Republicans joining the then-Democratic majority in the House of Representatives. In the Senate, the bill passed with a filibuster-proof majority of 61 to 36.
“Everyone should have the right to answer those questions for themselves without government interference. America takes a vital step toward equality, for liberty and justice, not just for some, but for everyone,” said Biden during the signing ceremony.
Visit CultureWars.news for more stories about same-sex marriages.
Watch the video below that talks about the signing of the Respect for Marriage bill into law.
This video is from the Wake Up channel on Brighteon.com.
Biden signs Respect for Marriage Act into law, granting federal protections to same-sex marriage.
Corporate media hypes Pope Francis’ support of SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.
Panama Supreme Court rejects legalization of same-sex ‘marriage,’ says it’s not a ‘human right.’
Viktor Orban gets standing ovation at CPAC for defending family values and the institution of marriage.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
big government, culture wars, Ermold v. Davis, gay mafia, gender, gender confused, insanity, Joe Biden, left cult, LGBT, Obergefell v. Hodges, progress, Respect for Marriage Act, same-sex marriage, social justice, woke mob, wokies
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 GENDERCONFUSED.COM
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. GenderConfused.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. GenderConfused.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.